Thursday, August 10, 2017

Since its construction in the 1960s, City Hall has been both praised and scorned. In fact, reports say that an onlooker during the initial unveiling of the winning design exclaimed “what the hell is that?” while others gasped. Despite such reactions from the public, the architectural community marveled at the building. In fact, the structure remains to this day perhaps the most well-known example of the architectural style of brutalism.

Either much-loved or much-reviled, it’s hard to deny the importance of the building in Boston’s history. Recent analysis has indicated that City Hall may have heralded in the beginning of Boston’s (re)development boom and encouraged development from the 70s to the 80s and beyond.  It’s possible City Hall can be credited with the beginning of gentrification in various parts of the City.

There are, however, serious structural issues impacting the building and raising doubt as to whether City Hall will survive another generation of mixed reviews. In light of its history and questionable future, the Getty Foundation recently announced a grant to help preserve City Hall.   The Foundation also spoke of the need for additional support, citing “serious issues [which] affect the structure's long-term preservation—from water ingress to inadequate joint support for structural concrete elements”. From the architectural community, tourists, students and natives alike, it’s hard to find someone who doesn’t have a strong opinion on the building. With the Getty Foundation’s support, the City Hall debate can continue . . .  for now.

Take our poll and let us know!

-Attorney Margaret Hoyt-Rupert

Disclaimer: Usage of This Website Does Not Make Us Your Lawyer
Usage of this website shall not create or constitute a "lawyer/client relationship" or serve as a basis for a claim against Warshaw, Di Carlo & Associates, P.C. Information on this website is provided for the convenience of the firm's clients and other interested users and cannot be relied upon as being correct, complete, up to date or applicable to the user’s personal situation or question. Nothing on this website should be relied upon by the user or shall constitute legal advice. Only a face-to-face private consultation with an attorney can provide reliable legal advice and properly address a user’s personal situation or needs. 

Web site designed and developed by Hungry Bird Creative Group.